gh-155300: speed up float repr() / str() with new Żmij algorithm - #155298
Closed
chirizxc wants to merge 4 commits into
Closed
gh-155300: speed up float repr() / str() with new Żmij algorithm#155298chirizxc wants to merge 4 commits into
repr() / str() with new Żmij algorithm#155298chirizxc wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
chirizxc
requested review from
a team,
AA-Turner,
emmatyping,
ericsnowcurrently,
erlend-aasland and
itamaro
as code owners
August 6, 2026 17:36
repr() / str() with new Żmij algorithmrepr() / str() with new Żmij algorithm
Member
|
Closing because it's not discussed. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🐉 Żmij
🐉 Żmij Algorithm
🐉 Żmij benchmark
🐉 Żmij licence (MIT)
dtoa-benchmark where this algorithm is benched
My machine
OS: Windows 10 Pro
CPU: Intel Core i5-11300H @ 3.11GHz
Summary
When I search for ussie on GitHub using keyword "zmij", I didn't find a single issue 🧐
Diff is large, but that's mainly because we're vendor algorithm itself into CPython.
On my machine, this results in a 4.09× speedup for
repr(x)and a 4.33× speedup forstr(x)Benchmark
I used this short benchmark:
repr()/str()#155300