[build] Update cibuildwheel's version to 4.1.0#22686
Open
jase231 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Test Results 22 files 22 suites 3d 16h 21m 50s ⏱️ Results for commit d6b1d2e. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This Pull request:
Updates
cibuildwheel's version to 4.1.0Changes or fixes:
cibuildwheel4.1.0 uses an updatedmanylinux_2_28container (2026.06.04-1 vs the previous 2026.03.20-1), which in turn shipsauditwheel6.7.0 which fixes a bug (see release notes) in how RPATHs were set in previous versions. This bug previously prevented linking against ROOT wheel (pip) distributions without workarounds.Comparing
readelf -d libfreetype-2f3b32b6.so.6.16.1output between libraries bundled byauditwheel6.7.0 andauditwheel6.6.0 respectively (note the missing RPATH in 6.6.0's version):vs.
Checklist:
This PR addresses some of the issues faced in #22654