Give some basic repo access (back) to moderators#2472
Merged
Conversation
steffahn
requested review from
Mark-Simulacrum,
emilyalbini,
jdno,
marcoieni and
ubiratansoares
as code owners
steffahn
force-pushed
the
mods-venue-access
branch
from
1acb5f4 to
e473906
Compare
|
This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
jieyouxu
approved these changes
May 16, 2026
Member
jieyouxu
left a comment
jieyouxu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes sense for venue mods (I think most of current set of venue mods have write access from being on other teams).
Since this mosifies r-l/r an infra-admin should also give approval.
jieyouxu
added
needs-infra-admin-review
Mark-Simulacrum
approved these changes
May 16, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As long as the basic concerns for moderator access to issue/PR discussions aren’t really solved any other way, I’d like to ask if we can add back write access to
rust-lang/rustto moderators since it’s by far the highest-traffic repo. (This thus undoes part of #1848.)Given the moderation relevance for current LLM-policy discussions, I’d also like to include
rust-lang/rust-forge. (This one is new, not part of something that #1848 removed.)