Skip to content

[codex] Add meaningful apply coverage tests#18

Draft
satococoa wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/add-meaningful-coverage-tests
Draft

[codex] Add meaningful apply coverage tests#18
satococoa wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/add-meaningful-coverage-tests

Conversation

@satococoa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

  • add integration tests for meaningful apply edge cases in the engine
  • add CLI tests for quiet and verbose apply output behavior on the current main contract
  • cover same-content skips, source symlink skips, and target-directory conflicts

Why

These cases represent real safety and UX expectations for ignored-file propagation between worktrees, and they were not covered before.

Impact

This raises confidence around apply behavior without adding coverage-only tests that lock in irrelevant implementation details.

Validation

  • make test

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 5, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7765661d-1235-46a9-a49d-115b33f58b66

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/add-meaningful-coverage-tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant