Skip to content

python implementation Week01-Day02#2670

Open
akarshchandra wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
akarshchandra:master
Open

python implementation Week01-Day02#2670
akarshchandra wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
akarshchandra:master

Conversation

@akarshchandra
Copy link
Copy Markdown

python implementation

python implementation
@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Implement Hash Set (problem1.py)

Strengths:

  1. Excellent understanding of hashing concepts - the comments explaining double hashing vs linear probing and chaining demonstrate deep conceptual knowledge
  2. Clean, well-documented code with clear method separation
  3. Correct edge case handling (bucket 0 gets extra space)
  4. Efficient O(1) operations for all three required methods
  5. Good use of lazy initialization to save space

Areas for Improvement:

  1. The variable name arrPos could be more descriptive as secondaryIndex for consistency with the reference solution
  2. Consider adding type hints for better code documentation (e.g., def add(self, key: int) -> None: is already present, which is good)
  3. The comment about "bruteforce" having an array of 10^6 could be clarified - the current approach is actually the optimized one, not bruteforce

Minor Suggestions:

  • The return statements at the end of add/remove methods are unnecessary in Python but don't affect functionality
  • Could add docstrings to the class for better documentation

Overall, this is a solid implementation that demonstrates strong understanding of hash table concepts and achieves optimal time complexity.

VERDICT: PASS


Implement Min Stack (problem2.py)

Strengths:

  • Correctly implements the O(1) requirement for all operations
  • Single stack approach is more space-efficient than the two-stack reference solution in most cases
  • Clear comments explaining the approach and why it works
  • Good edge case handling (val == min case)
  • Clean, readable code structure

Areas for Improvement:

  • The return statements at the end of push and pop are unnecessary in Python and add visual noise
  • Could add type hints for better code documentation (e.g., def push(self, val: int) -> None:)
  • The if not self.stack: return in pop is defensive but unnecessary given the problem constraints (pop will always be called on non-empty stacks)

Minor suggestions:

  • Consider using if self.stack: instead of if not self.stack: for slightly better readability
  • The comment about approach2 is a bit verbose; could be more concise

Overall, this is a solid implementation that demonstrates good understanding of the problem.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants