Skip to content

docs: bb swap execute — BitBadges-only auto-deploy + cross-chain handoff#77

Merged
trevormil merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/0440-swap-execute
May 17, 2026
Merged

docs: bb swap execute — BitBadges-only auto-deploy + cross-chain handoff#77
trevormil merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/0440-swap-execute

Conversation

@trevormil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Docs for the new bb swap execute / bb swap estimate --execute CLI path (ticket 0440), paired with SDK PR BitBadges/bitbadgesjs#249.

  • New Executing a swap (bb swap execute) section in for-developers/cli/standards-commands.md: the BitBadges-only constraint, default-emit vs --browser, --track, --force, and the cross-chain / EVM / multi-hop not-implemented behavior with the /sign + bb swap track handoff.
  • Corrected the swap subcommand list in the standards overview table (assets / chains / balances / estimate / execute / track / status / activities).
  • Cross-linked from the estimate API page (for-developers/bitbadges-api/estimating-swaps.md) to the new CLI section.

Test plan

  • Markdown only; internal anchor link verified against the new heading.
  • Render check on the docs site after merge.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Documents the new `bb swap execute` / `bb swap estimate --execute` path
(ticket 0440): BitBadges-only routes sign+broadcast via the reused
deploy signing flags; cross-chain / EVM / multi-hop routes are returned
but not auto-executed (explicit not-implemented), with the /sign +
`bb swap track` handoff. Adds a CLI section to the swap commands page,
fixes the swap subcommand list in the standards table, and cross-links
from the estimate API page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@trevormil trevormil merged commit 73cda17 into master May 17, 2026
2 checks passed
@trevormil trevormil deleted the docs/0440-swap-execute branch May 17, 2026 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant