Skip to content

Add support stubs for non-Unix targets#12317

Open
xtqqczze wants to merge 2 commits into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:not-supported-target
Open

Add support stubs for non-Unix targets#12317
xtqqczze wants to merge 2 commits into
uutils:mainfrom
xtqqczze:not-supported-target

Conversation

@xtqqczze
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@xtqqczze xtqqczze commented May 15, 2026

to avoid compile errors on non-Unix platforms

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/symlink (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/retry (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 15, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by 13.71%

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 315 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Memory cp_recursive_deep_tree[(120, 4)] 699.2 KB 562.5 KB +24.31%
Simulation ls_recursive_balanced_tree[(6, 4, 15)] 50.9 ms 48.9 ms +4.01%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing xtqqczze:not-supported-target (2d58805) with main (d09f351)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@xtqqczze xtqqczze marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2026 20:09
@oech3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

oech3 commented May 16, 2026

I don't like this solution. This is already covered by feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants