Added repo instructions for copilot#274
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new contributor-facing Copilot instructions document Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.github/copilot-instructions.md:
- Around line 24-35: The fenced code block showing the directory listing (the
triple-backtick block that begins with "src/main/resources/") lacks a language
specifier; update that block to include a language identifier such as "text"
(e.g., change ``` to ```text) so the block renders and lints correctly in
.github/copilot-instructions.md.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: dea64a93-dcab-4782-aeb4-c7275d2f79c9
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/copilot-instructions.md
1704849 to
7a35946
Compare
| ./gradlew spotlessApply # Auto-fix formatting violations | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Spotless enforces on `*.story`, `*.steps`, `*.table`, `*.properties`, `*.json`, `*.md`, and more: no trailing whitespace, no tabs (use spaces), file must end with a newline. |
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=web-app # Web UI (requires Chrome) | ||
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=ios-app # iOS (macOS + Appium + simulator) | ||
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=android-app # Android (macOS + Appium + emulator) | ||
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=electron # Electron (requires VS Code) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=electron # Electron (requires VS Code) | |
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=electron # Electron (VS Code is a system under test) |
| ./gradlew runStories -Pvividus.configuration-set.active=electron # Electron (requires VS Code) | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| `debugStories` skips build checks (used in some CI pipelines). Reports go to `output/reports/allure/`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| `debugStories` skips build checks (used in some CI pipelines). Reports go to `output/reports/allure/`. | |
| `debugStories` - task that skips build checks. | |
| Reports go to `output/reports/allure/`. |
| ## CI on Pull Requests | ||
|
|
||
| `gradle.yml` runs `./gradlew build` on every PR to `main` and fails on formatting violations or malformed properties. Suite-specific workflows trigger when their paths change: `test-run.yml` (rest-api/web-app), `mobile-test-run.yml` (mobile), `electron-tests.yml` (electron). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why is this section needed?
d1eaae8 to
3a64f2e
Compare
3a64f2e to
b02df42
Compare
|
Looks ok, but this PR depends on PR with configuration set changes |
Summary by CodeRabbit