Update Rust crate arrow-row to v59#8529
1 benchmark regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1200 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 374 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.01)] |
843 µs | 978.8 µs | -13.87% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_random |
254.3 µs | 196.6 µs | +29.36% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | take_10k_contiguous |
275.4 µs | 217.8 µs | +26.46% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_contiguous_patches |
289.3 µs | 230.6 µs | +25.45% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | patched_take_10k_random |
302 µs | 243.3 µs | +24.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | varbinview_large |
130.8 µs | 112.1 µs | +16.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress_rd[f64, (100000, 0.1)] |
1,021.3 µs | 886.9 µs | +15.15% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing renovate/arrow-row-59.x (c306dce) with develop (5df0f94)
Footnotes
-
374 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩