Execute spatial distance with RowFn - #9349
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
✅ 1978 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 442 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Simulation | nullable_point_column_x_constant_point |
754.7 µs | 657.9 µs | +14.72% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar[65536] |
9.4 µs | 8.3 µs | +13.89% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | compress_fsst[(500, 64, 8)] |
585.9 µs | 523.2 µs | +11.97% |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/row-fn-spatial-distance (f77666b) with develop (46a8d39)2
Footnotes
-
442 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
ct/row-fn-filter-scatter(b6c09be) during the generation of this report, sodevelop(46a8d39) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩