Extend MaskValuesRef to filter execution - #9542
1 benchmark regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 1979 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 54 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | Simulation | take[small_m/shuffled/primitive/nonnull/chunks=2048/indices=16] |
337.3 µs | 376.5 µs | -10.39% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | cold_misaligned[(16, 64)] |
429.3 µs | 380.5 µs | +12.82% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ct/mask-value-ref (8eef241) with develop (68cdf00)
Footnotes
-
54 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩