Skip to content

Use RowFn for primitive numeric comparisons - #9547

Draft
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/row-fn-associated-outputfrom
ct/row-fn-binary-numeric-comparison
Draft

Use RowFn for primitive numeric comparisons#9547
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/row-fn-associated-outputfrom
ct/row-fn-binary-numeric-comparison

Use RowFn for primitive numeric comparisons

e4d3617
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Aug 22, 2026 in 0s

Performance Regression: -7.19%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 14 improved benchmarks
❌ 34 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1933 untouched benchmarks
🆕 47 new benchmarks
⏩ 54 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation or_chain[16] 1.4 ms 2.1 ms -31.45%
❌ Simulation or_chain[1024] 1.5 ms 2.1 ms -31.13%
❌ Simulation float_gt[16] 292.3 µs 383.4 µs -23.78%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_10_conditions[1000] 381.6 µs 498.2 µs -23.39%
❌ Simulation float_gt[1024] 322.7 µs 416.5 µs -22.53%
❌ Simulation int_gt[16] 113.4 µs 146.1 µs -22.37%
❌ Simulation int_gt[1024] 120.2 µs 151.8 µs -20.78%
❌ Simulation lt_i64_nullable 135.3 µs 170.6 µs -20.69%
❌ Simulation or_chain[8192] 2.7 ms 3.3 ms -18.17%
❌ Simulation is_not_null_pred[16] 232.5 µs 282.3 µs -17.62%
❌ Simulation eq_i64_constant 99.4 µs 120.5 µs -17.55%
❌ Simulation is_not_null_pred[1024] 249 µs 300.6 µs -17.16%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_early_dominant[1000] 217.3 µs 258.2 µs -15.87%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_equality_lookup[1000] 326.7 µs 387.2 µs -15.64%
❌ Simulation case_when_nary_3_conditions[1000] 221 µs 260.4 µs -15.1%
❌ Simulation int_gt[8192] 171.4 µs 201.7 µs -15.02%
❌ Simulation compare_int_nullable 207.5 µs 243.8 µs -14.91%
❌ Simulation baseline_eq[4, 1024] 98.1 µs 115.3 µs -14.88%
❌ Simulation baseline_eq[16, 1024] 99.5 µs 116.7 µs -14.74%
❌ Simulation float_gt[8192] 580.8 µs 678 µs -14.33%
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing ct/row-fn-binary-numeric-comparison (e4d3617) with develop (332ae0b)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 54 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. No successful run was found on ct/row-fn-associated-output (4aa169c) during the generation of this report, so develop (332ae0b) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

View more details on CodSpeed HQ