Fix problems from cdeps1.0.94

[ekluzek]

Description of changes

Fix the problems that @billsacks noticed after cdesp1.0.94 came in. These were both things that I was embarrsesed to have let gone through.

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @billsacks

CDEPS Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Fixes #402

Are there dependencies on other component PRs (if so list): No

Are changes expected to change answers (bfb, different to roundoff, more substantial): b4b

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes): No

Testing performed (e.g. aux_cdeps, CESM prealpha, etc):
running aux_cdeps

Hashes used for testing:
submodules from: cesm3_0_beta08

[billsacks]

Thanks for these fixes, @ekluzek . I see this is marked as draft. Let me know when you feel it's ready to come in.

[billsacks]

@ekluzek - I'm going ahead and merging this even though you had marked it as a draft, because it seems good to get these fixes in. If there was more you still wanted to do, that can come in a follow-up PR.

[ekluzek]

@billsacks I remember running into trouble with testing in this one, which is why I had it marked as a draft. But, I don't remember the details now. I also didn't rimport the datasets, and that should also be done as well.

Also pinging @slevis-lmwg.

It would be good to have someone else run the aux_cdeps testlist here and make sure the CPLHIST tests either work, or have some sort of problem. And to have someone rimport the datasets.

[billsacks]

Shoot, you're right, @ekluzek - the cplhist test is failing now (SMS_Ld5.f10_f10_mt232.1850_DATM%CPLHIST_SLND_SICE_SOCN_SROF_SGLC_SWAV_SESP.derecho_intel.datm-cplhist). That's what I get for trying to move things along while you were out and I was about to leave on a trip myself... I should have trusted the draft status!

The problem is that a dtlimit is exceeded due to too big of a discrepancy between dtmin and dtmax:

(shr_strdata_readstrm)     reading file ub: /glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/inputdata/cplhist/cesm3_0/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330/atm/b.e30_alpha08o.B1850C_MTso.ne30_t232_wgx3.330.cpl.hx.atm.1h.inst.0101-01-01-03600.nc
(shr_strdata_advance)      Stream: 1 reading new data with  LB ymd,tod = 1010101  2700   UB ymd,tod = 1010101  6300
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: for stream 1
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: calendar = NO_LEAP
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: dday = 0
(shr_strdata_advance)  ERROR: dtime, dtmax, dtmin, dtlimit =  4.166667E-02   3.340417E+02   4.166667E-02   3.000000E+00

I'm going to open an issue for this and then temporarily remove this test from the testlist until it's resolved, in order to take the pressure off.