H-6472: Replace Biome with Oxfmt for formatting

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Replaces Biome with Oxfmt as the project formatter. Biome was only used for formatting (linter and import organizer were disabled), so this is a direct replacement.

Oxfmt picks up three things Biome had disabled pending v2: import sorting, package.json sorting, and Tailwind CSS class sorting.

🔗 Related links

• Oxfmt documentation

🔍 What does this change?

• Added oxfmt.config.ts with equivalent formatting rules
• Updated all biome format invocations to oxfmt across:
  • Root package.json (lint:format, fix:format)
  • .lefthook.yml pre-commit hook
  • Codegen scripts (hash-api, hash-isomorphic-utils, internal-api-client, ds-components, repo-chores)
• Updated mise install biome to mise install oxfmt in Dockerfiles and Vercel install scripts
• Updated editor extension recommendations (VS Code, Zed)
• Updated .github/actions/prune-repository to copy oxfmt.config.ts
• Updated .github/CONTRIBUTING.md tool list
• Removed biome.jsonc

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🐾 Next steps

• Replace ESLint with Oxlint

🛡 What tests cover this?

• CI lint:format step exercises oxfmt --check on the full repo

❓ How to test this?

1. Run yarn lint:format and confirm it passes
2. Run yarn fix:format and confirm it formats correctly
3. Confirm lefthook pre-commit hook runs oxfmt on staged files

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		May 19, 2026 7:49am
petrinaut	Error		May 19, 2026 7:49am

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 19, 2026 7:49am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Moderate risk due to repo-wide formatting/tooling migration (CI hooks, Docker/mise installs) and large mechanical diffs, though behavior should be unchanged outside of formatting and lint workflow adjustments.

Overview
Switches the repo formatter from Biome to Oxfmt. Adds oxfmt to tool management (mise) and updates dev/CI tooling to run oxfmt (pre-commit via lefthook, Docker build installs, and GitHub repo-prune action copying oxfmt.config.ts).

Updates docs/editor guidance (VS Code/Zed recommendations, CONTRIBUTING) and tweaks markdown linting to allow table column style variance. Also removes the yarn lint:package-json CI step and applies large-scale formatting-only changes across Markdown/JSONC/YAML and TypeScript (mostly import ordering/whitespace) including .claude skill docs and apps/hash-ai-worker-ts.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1dd3d38. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[indietyp]

• H-6472: Replace Biome with Oxfmt for formatting #8716 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.25%. Comparing base (7b67b01) to head (1dd3d38).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../shared/get-llm-response/get-anthropic-response.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...l/resolvers/knowledge/file/create-file-from-url.ts	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8716      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.31%   62.25%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1354     1354              
  Lines      137313   137434     +121     
  Branches     5793     5816      +23     
==========================================
- Hits        85568    85558      -10     
- Misses      50838    50969     +131     
  Partials      907      907              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <0.00%> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.81% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.44% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.06% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 3 potential issues.

There are 4 total unresolved issues (including 1 from previous review).

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 51bad65. Configure here.}

[TimDiekmann]

Looks good, but we need to honor import order in some cases and ignore generated files.

[TimDiekmann]

Personally, I liked the previous version more, but also don't feel strongly.

[TimDiekmann]

Personal preference: === as header is easier to read when looking at markdown, but you need to know that === is h1 and --- is h2

[TimDiekmann]

Import order must not change

[TimDiekmann]

This file is autogenerated

[TimDiekmann]

This file is autogenerated

[TimDiekmann]

This file is autogenerated

[TimDiekmann]

This file is autogenerated

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.680 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.587 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$22.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.378 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.160 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.466 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.659 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.379 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.969 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.280 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$80.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$47.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$51.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 350 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$59.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.21 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$98.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 542 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$88.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 401 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.570 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$280 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.03 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 117 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 148 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 112 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.278 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.099 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$32.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.721 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.725 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.448 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 44.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$89.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 516 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 689 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$97.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 660 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.263 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$99.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$126 \mathrm{ms} \pm 577 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.077 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.161 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 565 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 649 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.017 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 597 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$557 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.20 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.033 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[kube]

Seems the formatter was applied on a previous version.
This was changed by @alex-e-leon recently (merged Friday)

[alex-e-leon]

Good catch @kube - yeah @indietyp you'll need to be careful when rebasing that you don't accidentally revert any changes that have been merged in since you started this PR.

Might be easiest to just re-apply the formatting from scratch on main.